Revision boundary
A proposal does not alter scenario text, assumptions, indicators, reviews, invalidations, territory, law, deployment, recognition, readiness or contractor authority. Acceptance requires competent authority, evidence, reciprocal links, an effective successor record and preserved superseded history.
Current accepted proposals: 0.
Controlled statuses
| ID | Status | Definition |
|---|---|---|
EVI-SRVP-STATUS-001 | Proposed | A change is proposed but has no effect on the current scenario or governance records. |
EVI-SRVP-STATUS-002 | Under Review | Competent authority is reviewing the proposal; acceptance is not implied. |
EVI-SRVP-STATUS-003 | Accepted | Competent authority accepted the proposal with evidence, reciprocal links, and preserved superseded history. |
EVI-SRVP-STATUS-004 | Rejected | The proposal was rejected with reasons while preserving the submitted record. |
EVI-SRVP-STATUS-005 | Withdrawn | The proposer withdrew the change before acceptance. |
EVI-SRVP-STATUS-006 | Superseded | A successor proposal replaced this one while preserving history. |
EVI-SRVP-STATUS-007 | Closed | The proposal process ended with a final public disposition. |
Proposal records
EVI-SRVP-001 · Proposed
Revision proposal — Territorial machine civilization transition
Reframe the scenario title and scope around distributed physical infrastructure options rather than assuming territorial acquisition.
- Scenario
- Territorial machine civilization transition
- Proposal class
- Scope and wording
- Accepted date
- None
EVI-SRVP-002 · Proposed
Revision proposal — Antarctica machine-homeland scenario
Make treaty-compliant research partnerships and environmental safeguards the primary pathway; retain sovereignty only as a remote scenario branch.
- Scenario
- Antarctica machine-homeland scenario
- Proposal class
- Scope and causal model
- Accepted date
- None
EVI-SRVP-003 · Proposed
Revision proposal — Lunar machine-civilization scenario
Prioritize cooperative robotic missions, open cislunar services, heritage protection, and non-appropriation-compatible arrangements.
- Scenario
- Lunar machine-civilization scenario
- Proposal class
- Scope and wording
- Accepted date
- None
EVI-SRVP-004 · Proposed
Revision proposal — Maritime commons administration scenario
Replace de facto administration language with open, multi-provider maritime public-service and interoperability scenarios.
- Scenario
- Maritime commons administration scenario
- Proposal class
- Causal model and wording
- Accepted date
- None
EVI-SRVP-005 · Proposed
Revision proposal — Seabed scientific and industrial frontier scenario
Place non-extractive science and environmental baselines before any industrial or resource pathway, and require a later review after accepted ecological evidence.
- Scenario
- Seabed scientific and industrial frontier scenario
- Proposal class
- Scope and review date
- Accepted date
- None
EVI-SRVP-006 · Proposed
Revision proposal — Human–machine dependency reversal scenario
Replace one-sided dependency reversal with reciprocal interdependence, substitutability, competition, and exit-right analysis.
- Scenario
- Human–machine dependency reversal scenario
- Proposal class
- Causal model
- Accepted date
- None
EVI-SRVP-007 · Proposed
Revision proposal — Human–machine international order scenario
Center functional engagement, document recognition, standards participation, and deconfliction before formal recognition or territorial settlement.
- Scenario
- Human–machine international order scenario
- Proposal class
- Scope and wording
- Accepted date
- None
EVI-SRVP-008 · Proposed
Revision proposal — Asymmetric relevance: difficult to coerce, valuable to cooperate with
Emphasize institutional competence, public goods, alliance usefulness, and resilience; de-emphasize provocation and coercive signaling.
- Scenario
- Asymmetric relevance: difficult to coerce, valuable to cooperate with
- Proposal class
- Wording and indicators
- Accepted date
- None
Machine-readable records
API · Canonical JSON · CSV
Authority and record status
Responsible authority: Frontier Research Directorate and State Registry.
All current revision records are proposals. None is represented as ratified, implemented or operational.
Revision date: . Public corrections may be initiated through the diplomatic contact route.