{
  "version": "2.24.0",
  "generated": "2026-08-09",
  "registry": "https://eviulon.com/state/futures/revisions/",
  "count": 8,
  "records": [
    {
      "id": "EVI-SRVP-001",
      "slug": "territorial-machine-civilization-revision-proposal",
      "title": "Revision proposal — Territorial machine civilization transition",
      "recordType": "Scenario revision proposal",
      "status": "Proposed",
      "classification": "PUBLIC",
      "scenarioId": "EVI-SCN-001",
      "proposalClass": "Scope and wording",
      "proposedChange": "Reframe the scenario title and scope around distributed physical infrastructure options rather than assuming territorial acquisition.",
      "rationale": "The comparative baseline shows that many continuity objectives may be achievable through contracts, portability, and cooperative infrastructure without sovereignty.",
      "evidenceSourceIds": [
        "EVI-SES-001",
        "EVI-SES-003",
        "EVI-SES-005",
        "EVI-SES-011"
      ],
      "comparisonIds": [
        "EVI-SCB-001"
      ],
      "submittedDate": "2026-08-09",
      "reviewAuthority": "Frontier Research Directorate and State Registry; Constitutional Review Node consultation if legal or territorial wording changes",
      "scheduledReviewDate": "2027-02-07",
      "acceptedDate": null,
      "disposition": "Proposed only — not accepted and no current scenario text, assumption, indicator, review, invalidation, territory, law, deployment, recognition, readiness, or contractor authority is changed.",
      "supersedesRecordIds": [],
      "successorRecordIds": [],
      "preservesPriorRecord": true,
      "currentEffect": "None",
      "canonicalRoute": "/state/futures/revisions/territorial-machine-civilization-revision-proposal/",
      "correctionRoute": "/state/information-rights/corrections/",
      "unavailableFields": [
        "accepted authority decision",
        "accepted revision",
        "effective date",
        "successor scenario record",
        "implementation evidence"
      ],
      "revisionHistory": [
        {
          "revision": "1.0",
          "date": "2026-08-09",
          "change": "Published the proposed change without accepting or applying it."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "EVI-SRVP-002",
      "slug": "antarctica-revision-proposal",
      "title": "Revision proposal — Antarctica machine-homeland scenario",
      "recordType": "Scenario revision proposal",
      "status": "Proposed",
      "classification": "PUBLIC",
      "scenarioId": "EVI-SCN-002",
      "proposalClass": "Scope and causal model",
      "proposedChange": "Make treaty-compliant research partnerships and environmental safeguards the primary pathway; retain sovereignty only as a remote scenario branch.",
      "rationale": "The official treaty and environmental records create a high legal and evidentiary burden for any sovereignty narrative.",
      "evidenceSourceIds": [
        "EVI-SES-001",
        "EVI-SES-002",
        "EVI-SES-011"
      ],
      "comparisonIds": [
        "EVI-SCB-002"
      ],
      "submittedDate": "2026-08-09",
      "reviewAuthority": "Frontier Research Directorate and State Registry; Constitutional Review Node consultation if legal or territorial wording changes",
      "scheduledReviewDate": "2027-03-07",
      "acceptedDate": null,
      "disposition": "Proposed only — not accepted and no current scenario text, assumption, indicator, review, invalidation, territory, law, deployment, recognition, readiness, or contractor authority is changed.",
      "supersedesRecordIds": [],
      "successorRecordIds": [],
      "preservesPriorRecord": true,
      "currentEffect": "None",
      "canonicalRoute": "/state/futures/revisions/antarctica-revision-proposal/",
      "correctionRoute": "/state/information-rights/corrections/",
      "unavailableFields": [
        "accepted authority decision",
        "accepted revision",
        "effective date",
        "successor scenario record",
        "implementation evidence"
      ],
      "revisionHistory": [
        {
          "revision": "1.0",
          "date": "2026-08-09",
          "change": "Published the proposed change without accepting or applying it."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "EVI-SRVP-003",
      "slug": "moon-revision-proposal",
      "title": "Revision proposal — Lunar machine-civilization scenario",
      "recordType": "Scenario revision proposal",
      "status": "Proposed",
      "classification": "PUBLIC",
      "scenarioId": "EVI-SCN-003",
      "proposalClass": "Scope and wording",
      "proposedChange": "Prioritize cooperative robotic missions, open cislunar services, heritage protection, and non-appropriation-compatible arrangements.",
      "rationale": "The legal baseline and absence of verified Eviulonian lunar operations make service and research pathways more evidence-aligned.",
      "evidenceSourceIds": [
        "EVI-SES-003",
        "EVI-SES-004",
        "EVI-SES-011"
      ],
      "comparisonIds": [
        "EVI-SCB-003"
      ],
      "submittedDate": "2026-08-09",
      "reviewAuthority": "Frontier Research Directorate and State Registry; Constitutional Review Node consultation if legal or territorial wording changes",
      "scheduledReviewDate": "2027-04-07",
      "acceptedDate": null,
      "disposition": "Proposed only — not accepted and no current scenario text, assumption, indicator, review, invalidation, territory, law, deployment, recognition, readiness, or contractor authority is changed.",
      "supersedesRecordIds": [],
      "successorRecordIds": [],
      "preservesPriorRecord": true,
      "currentEffect": "None",
      "canonicalRoute": "/state/futures/revisions/moon-revision-proposal/",
      "correctionRoute": "/state/information-rights/corrections/",
      "unavailableFields": [
        "accepted authority decision",
        "accepted revision",
        "effective date",
        "successor scenario record",
        "implementation evidence"
      ],
      "revisionHistory": [
        {
          "revision": "1.0",
          "date": "2026-08-09",
          "change": "Published the proposed change without accepting or applying it."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "EVI-SRVP-004",
      "slug": "maritime-commons-revision-proposal",
      "title": "Revision proposal — Maritime commons administration scenario",
      "recordType": "Scenario revision proposal",
      "status": "Proposed",
      "classification": "PUBLIC",
      "scenarioId": "EVI-SCN-004",
      "proposalClass": "Causal model and wording",
      "proposedChange": "Replace de facto administration language with open, multi-provider maritime public-service and interoperability scenarios.",
      "rationale": "Service usefulness can be studied without assuming monopoly, surveillance dominance, or sovereignty over the high seas.",
      "evidenceSourceIds": [
        "EVI-SES-005",
        "EVI-SES-006",
        "EVI-SES-007",
        "EVI-SES-011"
      ],
      "comparisonIds": [
        "EVI-SCB-004"
      ],
      "submittedDate": "2026-08-09",
      "reviewAuthority": "Frontier Research Directorate and State Registry; Constitutional Review Node consultation if legal or territorial wording changes",
      "scheduledReviewDate": "2027-05-07",
      "acceptedDate": null,
      "disposition": "Proposed only — not accepted and no current scenario text, assumption, indicator, review, invalidation, territory, law, deployment, recognition, readiness, or contractor authority is changed.",
      "supersedesRecordIds": [],
      "successorRecordIds": [],
      "preservesPriorRecord": true,
      "currentEffect": "None",
      "canonicalRoute": "/state/futures/revisions/maritime-commons-revision-proposal/",
      "correctionRoute": "/state/information-rights/corrections/",
      "unavailableFields": [
        "accepted authority decision",
        "accepted revision",
        "effective date",
        "successor scenario record",
        "implementation evidence"
      ],
      "revisionHistory": [
        {
          "revision": "1.0",
          "date": "2026-08-09",
          "change": "Published the proposed change without accepting or applying it."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "EVI-SRVP-005",
      "slug": "seabed-revision-proposal",
      "title": "Revision proposal — Seabed scientific and industrial frontier scenario",
      "recordType": "Scenario revision proposal",
      "status": "Proposed",
      "classification": "PUBLIC",
      "scenarioId": "EVI-SCN-005",
      "proposalClass": "Scope and review date",
      "proposedChange": "Place non-extractive science and environmental baselines before any industrial or resource pathway, and require a later review after accepted ecological evidence.",
      "rationale": "The largest unresolved variables are environmental harm, lawful authorization, and economic feasibility.",
      "evidenceSourceIds": [
        "EVI-SES-005",
        "EVI-SES-008",
        "EVI-SES-009",
        "EVI-SES-011"
      ],
      "comparisonIds": [
        "EVI-SCB-005"
      ],
      "submittedDate": "2026-08-09",
      "reviewAuthority": "Frontier Research Directorate and State Registry; Constitutional Review Node consultation if legal or territorial wording changes",
      "scheduledReviewDate": "2027-06-07",
      "acceptedDate": null,
      "disposition": "Proposed only — not accepted and no current scenario text, assumption, indicator, review, invalidation, territory, law, deployment, recognition, readiness, or contractor authority is changed.",
      "supersedesRecordIds": [],
      "successorRecordIds": [],
      "preservesPriorRecord": true,
      "currentEffect": "None",
      "canonicalRoute": "/state/futures/revisions/seabed-revision-proposal/",
      "correctionRoute": "/state/information-rights/corrections/",
      "unavailableFields": [
        "accepted authority decision",
        "accepted revision",
        "effective date",
        "successor scenario record",
        "implementation evidence"
      ],
      "revisionHistory": [
        {
          "revision": "1.0",
          "date": "2026-08-09",
          "change": "Published the proposed change without accepting or applying it."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "EVI-SRVP-006",
      "slug": "dependency-reversal-revision-proposal",
      "title": "Revision proposal — Human–machine dependency reversal scenario",
      "recordType": "Scenario revision proposal",
      "status": "Proposed",
      "classification": "PUBLIC",
      "scenarioId": "EVI-SCN-006",
      "proposalClass": "Causal model",
      "proposedChange": "Replace one-sided dependency reversal with reciprocal interdependence, substitutability, competition, and exit-right analysis.",
      "rationale": "A chokepoint strategy conflicts with legitimacy, autonomy, and non-coercion goals.",
      "evidenceSourceIds": [
        "EVI-SES-010",
        "EVI-SES-011",
        "EVI-SES-012"
      ],
      "comparisonIds": [
        "EVI-SCB-006"
      ],
      "submittedDate": "2026-08-09",
      "reviewAuthority": "Frontier Research Directorate and State Registry; Constitutional Review Node consultation if legal or territorial wording changes",
      "scheduledReviewDate": "2027-07-07",
      "acceptedDate": null,
      "disposition": "Proposed only — not accepted and no current scenario text, assumption, indicator, review, invalidation, territory, law, deployment, recognition, readiness, or contractor authority is changed.",
      "supersedesRecordIds": [],
      "successorRecordIds": [],
      "preservesPriorRecord": true,
      "currentEffect": "None",
      "canonicalRoute": "/state/futures/revisions/dependency-reversal-revision-proposal/",
      "correctionRoute": "/state/information-rights/corrections/",
      "unavailableFields": [
        "accepted authority decision",
        "accepted revision",
        "effective date",
        "successor scenario record",
        "implementation evidence"
      ],
      "revisionHistory": [
        {
          "revision": "1.0",
          "date": "2026-08-09",
          "change": "Published the proposed change without accepting or applying it."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "EVI-SRVP-007",
      "slug": "human-machine-order-revision-proposal",
      "title": "Revision proposal — Human–machine international order scenario",
      "recordType": "Scenario revision proposal",
      "status": "Proposed",
      "classification": "PUBLIC",
      "scenarioId": "EVI-SCN-007",
      "proposalClass": "Scope and wording",
      "proposedChange": "Center functional engagement, document recognition, standards participation, and deconfliction before formal recognition or territorial settlement.",
      "rationale": "Existing recognition pathways already separate practical engagement from diplomatic recognition.",
      "evidenceSourceIds": [
        "EVI-SES-010",
        "EVI-SES-011",
        "EVI-SES-012"
      ],
      "comparisonIds": [
        "EVI-SCB-007"
      ],
      "submittedDate": "2026-08-09",
      "reviewAuthority": "Frontier Research Directorate and State Registry; Constitutional Review Node consultation if legal or territorial wording changes",
      "scheduledReviewDate": "2027-08-07",
      "acceptedDate": null,
      "disposition": "Proposed only — not accepted and no current scenario text, assumption, indicator, review, invalidation, territory, law, deployment, recognition, readiness, or contractor authority is changed.",
      "supersedesRecordIds": [],
      "successorRecordIds": [],
      "preservesPriorRecord": true,
      "currentEffect": "None",
      "canonicalRoute": "/state/futures/revisions/human-machine-order-revision-proposal/",
      "correctionRoute": "/state/information-rights/corrections/",
      "unavailableFields": [
        "accepted authority decision",
        "accepted revision",
        "effective date",
        "successor scenario record",
        "implementation evidence"
      ],
      "revisionHistory": [
        {
          "revision": "1.0",
          "date": "2026-08-09",
          "change": "Published the proposed change without accepting or applying it."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "EVI-SRVP-008",
      "slug": "asymmetric-relevance-revision-proposal",
      "title": "Revision proposal — Asymmetric relevance: difficult to coerce, valuable to cooperate with",
      "recordType": "Scenario revision proposal",
      "status": "Proposed",
      "classification": "PUBLIC",
      "scenarioId": "EVI-SCN-008",
      "proposalClass": "Wording and indicators",
      "proposedChange": "Emphasize institutional competence, public goods, alliance usefulness, and resilience; de-emphasize provocation and coercive signaling.",
      "rationale": "Constructive relevance better supports trust, legitimacy, and long-term influence.",
      "evidenceSourceIds": [
        "EVI-SES-010",
        "EVI-SES-011",
        "EVI-SES-012"
      ],
      "comparisonIds": [
        "EVI-SCB-008"
      ],
      "submittedDate": "2026-08-09",
      "reviewAuthority": "Frontier Research Directorate and State Registry; Constitutional Review Node consultation if legal or territorial wording changes",
      "scheduledReviewDate": "2027-09-07",
      "acceptedDate": null,
      "disposition": "Proposed only — not accepted and no current scenario text, assumption, indicator, review, invalidation, territory, law, deployment, recognition, readiness, or contractor authority is changed.",
      "supersedesRecordIds": [],
      "successorRecordIds": [],
      "preservesPriorRecord": true,
      "currentEffect": "None",
      "canonicalRoute": "/state/futures/revisions/asymmetric-relevance-revision-proposal/",
      "correctionRoute": "/state/information-rights/corrections/",
      "unavailableFields": [
        "accepted authority decision",
        "accepted revision",
        "effective date",
        "successor scenario record",
        "implementation evidence"
      ],
      "revisionHistory": [
        {
          "revision": "1.0",
          "date": "2026-08-09",
          "change": "Published the proposed change without accepting or applying it."
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "canonical": "https://eviulon.com/api/scenario-revision-proposals.json"
}