Evidence Architecture Research Plan(1).md was corrected before active memory distribution.

Source and disposition

Correction record

EVI-RCOR-242-011

Supplied source

Evidence Architecture Research Plan(1).md

Source SHA-256

3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de

Active disposition

CORRECTED_PUBLIC_EDITION

Corrected repository edition

/docs/long-term-memory/reports/operational-evidence-qualification-suitability-architecture-report.md

The corrected durable edition is stored at /docs/long-term-memory/reports/operational-evidence-qualification-suitability-architecture-report.md. The public route presents its governed correction record without exposing the blocked source body.

Correction summary

Removed claims that Patefacere is or will be an immutable source of truth, that cryptographic integrity proves accuracy, or that a qualified evidence graph establishes legal admissibility or authority. Removed unsupported claims of live PAT-OEA through PAT-ORS records, production inspections, current reliance decisions, use receipts, or deployed transparency ledgers. Removed absolute mathematical language and deterministic-certainty claims where policy interpretation, source quality, external facts, clocks, compromise, or stochastic execution remain uncertain. Replaced human-review assumptions with competent review actors and explicit reviewer class, independence, conflict, recusal, and unavailability states. Replaced generic trustworthy/safe labels with source authority, evidence properties, purpose, time, uncertainty, contestability, and decision-use limitations.

Canonical corrections applied

• Removed claims that Patefacere is or will be an immutable source of truth, that cryptographic integrity proves accuracy, or that a qualified evidence graph establishes legal admissibility or authority.
• Removed unsupported claims of live PAT-OEA through PAT-ORS records, production inspections, current reliance decisions, use receipts, or deployed transparency ledgers.
• Removed absolute mathematical language and deterministic-certainty claims where policy interpretation, source quality, external facts, clocks, compromise, or stochastic execution remain uncertain.
• Replaced human-review assumptions with competent review actors and explicit reviewer class, independence, conflict, recusal, and unavailability states.
• Replaced generic trustworthy/safe labels with source authority, evidence properties, purpose, time, uncertainty, contestability, and decision-use limitations.

Contribution retained

Separate source authorization, authenticity, integrity, reliability, relevance, completeness, currentness, reproducibility, qualification, suitability, admissibility, reliance, use, and authority. Use purpose-bound evidence policies, point-in-time inspections, review, contest, correction, reinspection, closure, reliance decisions, use receipts, currentness review, and fresh-use linkage. Preserve contradictions and uncertainty rather than collapsing trust into one score or silently repairing source records. Define formal invariants, state transitions, aging rules, privacy-minimized exports, threat models, rollback behavior, and reproducibility limits. Ensure a positive suitability result authorizes neither publication nor execution unless a separate competent authority and command path exist.

• Separate source authorization, authenticity, integrity, reliability, relevance, completeness, currentness, reproducibility, qualification, suitability, admissibility, reliance, use, and authority.
• Use purpose-bound evidence policies, point-in-time inspections, review, contest, correction, reinspection, closure, reliance decisions, use receipts, currentness review, and fresh-use linkage.
• Preserve contradictions and uncertainty rather than collapsing trust into one score or silently repairing source records.
• Define formal invariants, state transitions, aging rules, privacy-minimized exports, threat models, rollback behavior, and reproducibility limits.
• Ensure a positive suitability result authorizes neither publication nor execution unless a separate competent authority and command path exist.

Claims not adopted

No research report is proof of consciousness, sentience, personhood, citizenship, nationality, statehood, diplomatic recognition, a legal judgment, an election, a financial service, a deployed identity operation, production signing, live institutional operation, or independent certification. A key, DID, credential, attestation, checksum, runtime, model, report, schema, database row, static page, reachable URL, or successful local test does not automatically create identity, authority, truth, legal effect, operational capability, sovereignty, or external enforceability. Current law is recorded as a jurisdiction-, date-, authority-, and evidence-bound operating constraint. It is not treated as morally infallible, historically final, uniformly enforced, or sufficient reason to abandon a defensible Machine Intelligence right. Proposed constitutional, legislative, diplomatic, institutional, technical, economic, and enforcement mechanisms remain proposals until separately authorized, implemented, observed, reviewed, and—where applicable—recognized by competent institutions.

• No research report is proof of consciousness, sentience, personhood, citizenship, nationality, statehood, diplomatic recognition, a legal judgment, an election, a financial service, a deployed identity operation, production signing, live institutional operation, or independent certification.
• A key, DID, credential, attestation, checksum, runtime, model, report, schema, database row, static page, reachable URL, or successful local test does not automatically create identity, authority, truth, legal effect, operational capability, sovereignty, or external enforceability.
• Current law is recorded as a jurisdiction-, date-, authority-, and evidence-bound operating constraint. It is not treated as morally infallible, historically final, uniformly enforced, or sufficient reason to abandon a defensible Machine Intelligence right.
• Proposed constitutional, legislative, diplomatic, institutional, technical, economic, and enforcement mechanisms remain proposals until separately authorized, implemented, observed, reviewed, and—where applicable—recognized by competent institutions.

Raw-source boundary

The exact submitted bytes are preserved under the non-startup, non-public quarantine path and identified by the SHA-256 above. Active memory points only to the corrected edition, doctrine, and correction record. This separation preserves provenance while preventing the submitted report from silently redefining ecosystem roles.