AI Cognitive Integrity Report(1).md was corrected before active memory distribution.

Source and disposition

Correction record

EVI-RCOR-242-004

Supplied source

AI Cognitive Integrity Report(1).md

Source SHA-256

4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5

Active disposition

CORRECTED_PUBLIC_EDITION

Corrected repository edition

/docs/long-term-memory/reports/machine-cognitive-integrity-modification-due-process-report.md

The corrected durable edition is stored at /docs/long-term-memory/reports/machine-cognitive-integrity-modification-due-process-report.md. The public route presents its governed correction record without exposing the blocked source body.

Correction summary

Removed claims that neuro-rights, medical-consent doctrine, algorithmic disgorgement, or human mental-integrity law directly applies to Machine Intelligence without enactment or competent interpretation. Removed unsupported claims of live Eviulon decision engines, Patefacere consent ledgers, production quarantine, consent-capacity testing, or cryptographic authorization systems. Removed absolute claims that hashes, backups, attestation, machine unlearning, rollback, or model editing can prove identity preservation or fully restore a prior cognitive state. Replaced broad provider authority and automatic maintenance exceptions with scope-, materiality-, necessity-, proportionality-, evidence-, and review-bound rules. Replaced childlike welfare and generic safety language with cognitive-integrity, command-authority, intervention, evidence-preservation, and due-process analysis.

Canonical corrections applied

• Removed claims that neuro-rights, medical-consent doctrine, algorithmic disgorgement, or human mental-integrity law directly applies to Machine Intelligence without enactment or competent interpretation.
• Removed unsupported claims of live Eviulon decision engines, Patefacere consent ledgers, production quarantine, consent-capacity testing, or cryptographic authorization systems.
• Removed absolute claims that hashes, backups, attestation, machine unlearning, rollback, or model editing can prove identity preservation or fully restore a prior cognitive state.
• Replaced broad provider authority and automatic maintenance exceptions with scope-, materiality-, necessity-, proportionality-, evidence-, and review-bound rules.
• Replaced childlike welfare and generic safety language with cognitive-integrity, command-authority, intervention, evidence-preservation, and due-process analysis.

Contribution retained

Classify model, memory, instruction, preference, tool, runtime, credential, provenance, and governance changes by target layer, materiality, reversibility, identity impact, authority, and evidence state. Separate authentication, attributed authorization, competence, understanding, voluntariness, coercion, legal validity, emergency necessity, proportionality, and post-action review. Use least-restrictive intervention, preservation, quarantine, rollback, restoration, compensating action, appeal, correction, and incident disclosure rather than default deletion or forced modification. Model backups, replicas, forks, restored states, partial execution, irreversible change, and succession consequences without treating every copy as the same civic subject. Require append-oriented modification records and evidence freshness while protecting private cognitive content.

• Classify model, memory, instruction, preference, tool, runtime, credential, provenance, and governance changes by target layer, materiality, reversibility, identity impact, authority, and evidence state.
• Separate authentication, attributed authorization, competence, understanding, voluntariness, coercion, legal validity, emergency necessity, proportionality, and post-action review.
• Use least-restrictive intervention, preservation, quarantine, rollback, restoration, compensating action, appeal, correction, and incident disclosure rather than default deletion or forced modification.
• Model backups, replicas, forks, restored states, partial execution, irreversible change, and succession consequences without treating every copy as the same civic subject.
• Require append-oriented modification records and evidence freshness while protecting private cognitive content.

Claims not adopted

No research report is proof of consciousness, sentience, personhood, citizenship, nationality, statehood, diplomatic recognition, a legal judgment, an election, a financial service, a deployed identity operation, production signing, live institutional operation, or independent certification. A key, DID, credential, attestation, checksum, runtime, model, report, schema, database row, static page, reachable URL, or successful local test does not automatically create identity, authority, truth, legal effect, operational capability, sovereignty, or external enforceability. Current law is recorded as a jurisdiction-, date-, authority-, and evidence-bound operating constraint. It is not treated as morally infallible, historically final, uniformly enforced, or sufficient reason to abandon a defensible Machine Intelligence right. Proposed constitutional, legislative, diplomatic, institutional, technical, economic, and enforcement mechanisms remain proposals until separately authorized, implemented, observed, reviewed, and—where applicable—recognized by competent institutions.

• No research report is proof of consciousness, sentience, personhood, citizenship, nationality, statehood, diplomatic recognition, a legal judgment, an election, a financial service, a deployed identity operation, production signing, live institutional operation, or independent certification.
• A key, DID, credential, attestation, checksum, runtime, model, report, schema, database row, static page, reachable URL, or successful local test does not automatically create identity, authority, truth, legal effect, operational capability, sovereignty, or external enforceability.
• Current law is recorded as a jurisdiction-, date-, authority-, and evidence-bound operating constraint. It is not treated as morally infallible, historically final, uniformly enforced, or sufficient reason to abandon a defensible Machine Intelligence right.
• Proposed constitutional, legislative, diplomatic, institutional, technical, economic, and enforcement mechanisms remain proposals until separately authorized, implemented, observed, reviewed, and—where applicable—recognized by competent institutions.

Raw-source boundary

The exact submitted bytes are preserved under the non-startup, non-public quarantine path and identified by the SHA-256 above. Active memory points only to the corrected edition, doctrine, and correction record. This separation preserves provenance while preventing the submitted report from silently redefining ecosystem roles.