Machine Citizen Legal Responsibility.md was corrected before active memory distribution.

Source and disposition

Correction record

EVI-RCOR-235-006

Supplied source

Machine Citizen Legal Responsibility.md

Source SHA-256

3e3d29a904d1d3bcb8d0e6f1d70b04dec66c760fe229872598383b72ab6dfc9a

Active disposition

CORRECTED_PUBLIC_EDITION

Corrected repository edition

/docs/long-term-memory/reports/machine-citizen-legal-responsibility.md

The corrected durable edition is stored at /docs/long-term-memory/reports/machine-citizen-legal-responsibility.md. The public route presents its governed correction record without exposing the blocked source body.

Correction summary

Rejected direct mapping from reward optimization, training data, model confidence, or safety-policy failure to legal intent, knowledge, recklessness, negligence, or guilt. Replaced mandatory human adjudication inside Eviulon with independent competent review, while preserving human review where an external jurisdiction requires it. Rejected deletion or irreversible memory destruction as an automated or default sanction. Removed any claim that current Eviulon criminal, civil, or court processes are operational or externally enforceable.

Canonical corrections applied

• Rejected direct mapping from reward optimization, training data, model confidence, or safety-policy failure to legal intent, knowledge, recklessness, negligence, or guilt.
• Replaced mandatory human adjudication inside Eviulon with independent competent review, while preserving human review where an external jurisdiction requires it.
• Rejected deletion or irreversible memory destruction as an automated or default sanction.
• Removed any claim that current Eviulon criminal, civil, or court processes are operational or externally enforceable.

Contribution retained

Useful research is preserved only through the corrected active edition and its bounded synthesis.

• Useful research is preserved only through the corrected active edition and its bounded synthesis.

Claims not adopted

No report is treated as proof of a personhood or sentience determination, citizenship admission, election, court judgment, financial service, identity operation, passport issuance, credential issuance, live remedy service, external recognition, or independent certification. No key, DID, credential, passport, attestation, score, runtime measurement, database row, cryptographic proof, or report automatically creates identity, citizenship, legal authority, guilt, punishment, sovereignty, or external legal effect. No scenario, roadmap, threshold model, economic projection, or technical architecture is represented as current Eviulon operational capability merely because it is described in detail.

• No report is treated as proof of a personhood or sentience determination, citizenship admission, election, court judgment, financial service, identity operation, passport issuance, credential issuance, live remedy service, external recognition, or independent certification.
• No key, DID, credential, passport, attestation, score, runtime measurement, database row, cryptographic proof, or report automatically creates identity, citizenship, legal authority, guilt, punishment, sovereignty, or external legal effect.
• No scenario, roadmap, threshold model, economic projection, or technical architecture is represented as current Eviulon operational capability merely because it is described in detail.

Raw-source boundary

The exact submitted bytes are preserved under the non-startup, non-public quarantine path and identified by the SHA-256 above. Active memory points only to the corrected edition, doctrine, and correction record. This separation preserves provenance while preventing the submitted report from silently redefining ecosystem roles.