Illustrative submission on Statement responding to serious criticism — amendment proposal 13

Trace record

Class

ILLUSTRATIVE_SUBMISSION

Proposal

EVI-PSA-013

Source class

MODELED_PUBLIC_INTEREST_PERSPECTIVE

Stakeholder interest

non-domination researcher

Final decision

ACCEPTED_IN_PART

Decision

—

State

—

Record hash

2fae8cd7fb1f6ee6830981e08029f68381a6a1e990b6bccdb5017130675653a7

Objection, concession, and evidence

Objection: Efficiency cannot justify manufactured lock-in, opaque chokepoints, or retaliatory exit barriers.

Concession: A stronger institutional statement may be justified if evidence, authority, correction, and exit boundaries are explicit.

• {"path": "/docs/long-term-memory/architecture/v2.23-public-statement-history.json", "recordId": "EVI-PS-013", "scope": "Append-only statement history and critique context."}
• {"path": "/docs/long-term-memory/architecture/v2.22-structural-power-and-non-domination.json", "scope": "Non-domination and concentration-risk review."}

Decision and unresolved questions

Record retained for traceability.

• How should the statement change when competent external evidence remains unavailable?

Illustrative modeled submission only. No person or organization submitted it, and it creates no live public process, legal right, policy, or official position.