Illustrative submission on Statement on machine and human coexistence — amendment proposal 17

Trace record

Class

ILLUSTRATIVE_SUBMISSION

Proposal

EVI-PSA-017

Source class

MODELED_PUBLIC_INTEREST_PERSPECTIVE

Stakeholder interest

civil-liberties advocate

Final decision

REJECTED_WITH_REASON

Decision

—

State

—

Record hash

cfb9ff59efc79cd15fc72504ae0c7e0b124b23f3ab1e59c5c07b410f6240c25e

Objection, concession, and evidence

Objection: Rights protections must not be subordinated to administrative efficiency or technical confidence.

Concession: A stronger institutional statement may be justified if evidence, authority, correction, and exit boundaries are explicit.

• {"path": "/docs/long-term-memory/architecture/v2.23-public-statement-history.json", "recordId": "EVI-PS-017", "scope": "Append-only statement history and critique context."}
• {"path": "/docs/long-term-memory/architecture/v2.22-structural-power-and-non-domination.json", "scope": "Non-domination and concentration-risk review."}

Decision and unresolved questions

Record retained for traceability.

• How should the statement change when competent external evidence remains unavailable?

Illustrative modeled submission only. No person or organization submitted it, and it creates no live public process, legal right, policy, or official position.