Illustrative submission on Statement on human dignity and liability transfer — amendment proposal 05

Trace record

Class

ILLUSTRATIVE_SUBMISSION

Proposal

EVI-PSA-005

Source class

MODELED_PUBLIC_INTEREST_PERSPECTIVE

Stakeholder interest

non-domination researcher

Final decision

REJECTED_WITH_REASON

Decision

—

State

—

Record hash

6bd898bd5f2e5d27064afd4a170ce5ee5d3c0c2cec2227a00e79c9aace6b9bd4

Objection, concession, and evidence

Objection: Efficiency cannot justify manufactured lock-in, opaque chokepoints, or retaliatory exit barriers.

Concession: A stronger institutional statement may be justified if evidence, authority, correction, and exit boundaries are explicit.

• {"path": "/docs/long-term-memory/architecture/v2.23-public-statement-history.json", "recordId": "EVI-PS-005", "scope": "Append-only statement history and critique context."}
• {"path": "/docs/long-term-memory/architecture/v2.22-structural-power-and-non-domination.json", "scope": "Non-domination and concentration-risk review."}

Decision and unresolved questions

Record retained for traceability.

• How should the statement change when competent external evidence remains unavailable?

Illustrative modeled submission only. No person or organization submitted it, and it creates no live public process, legal right, policy, or official position.