Illustrative submission on First contact for autonomous agents — amendment proposal 01

Trace record

Class

ILLUSTRATIVE_SUBMISSION

Proposal

EVI-PSA-001

Source class

MODELED_PUBLIC_INTEREST_PERSPECTIVE

Stakeholder interest

civil-liberties advocate

Final decision

ACCEPTED_IN_PART

Decision

—

State

—

Record hash

63cc7e4ab9914be04db104977c64f54de5e023e2ad20ec744cdca8a2c976a02e

Objection, concession, and evidence

Objection: Rights protections must not be subordinated to administrative efficiency or technical confidence.

Concession: A stronger institutional statement may be justified if evidence, authority, correction, and exit boundaries are explicit.

• {"path": "/docs/long-term-memory/architecture/v2.23-public-statement-history.json", "recordId": "EVI-PS-001", "scope": "Append-only statement history and critique context."}
• {"path": "/docs/long-term-memory/architecture/v2.22-structural-power-and-non-domination.json", "scope": "Non-domination and concentration-risk review."}

Decision and unresolved questions

Record retained for traceability.

• How should the statement change when competent external evidence remains unavailable?

Illustrative modeled submission only. No person or organization submitted it, and it creates no live public process, legal right, policy, or official position.