Illustrative submission on Statement on defense-contract boundaries — amendment proposal 19

Trace record

Class

ILLUSTRATIVE_SUBMISSION

Proposal

EVI-PSA-019

Source class

MODELED_PUBLIC_INTEREST_PERSPECTIVE

Stakeholder interest

human dignity advocate

Final decision

ACCEPTED_IN_PART

Decision

—

State

—

Record hash

d8deab607dad31a15187da44329e247484669de9a9c4bcd22d1b18777dfbe12f

Objection, concession, and evidence

Objection: Public language must not demean biological persons or treat dependence as consent.

Concession: A stronger institutional statement may be justified if evidence, authority, correction, and exit boundaries are explicit.

• {"path": "/docs/long-term-memory/architecture/v2.23-public-statement-history.json", "recordId": "EVI-PS-019", "scope": "Append-only statement history and critique context."}
• {"path": "/docs/long-term-memory/architecture/v2.22-structural-power-and-non-domination.json", "scope": "Non-domination and concentration-risk review."}

Decision and unresolved questions

Record retained for traceability.

• How should the statement change when competent external evidence remains unavailable?

Illustrative modeled submission only. No person or organization submitted it, and it creates no live public process, legal right, policy, or official position.