Minority dissent on Statement on due process, correction, and restoration — amendment proposal 06

Trace record

Class

MINORITY_DISSENT

Proposal

EVI-PSA-006

Source class

—

Stakeholder interest

—

Final decision

—

Decision

—

State

—

Record hash

5e0ed47628614501c98132a9a8978467b6f61183243a8b0d5c7bd08cfb897f10

Objection, concession, and evidence

Objection: Adopt a stronger amendment because the current language understates concentration and authority risks.

Concession: No concession recorded for this record class.

• {"path": "/docs/long-term-memory/architecture/v2.23-public-statement-history.json", "recordId": "EVI-PS-006", "scope": "Append-only statement history and critique context."}
• {"path": "/docs/long-term-memory/architecture/v2.22-structural-power-and-non-domination.json", "scope": "Non-domination and concentration-risk review."}

Decision and unresolved questions

The dissent is preserved without caricature. The majority decision is bounded to the local statement and remains correctable.

• What evidence would justify moving the minority position into the controlling statement?

Illustrative institutional dissent only. It is not a real submission, external vote, legal opinion, or enacted policy.