CROSS-REPORT STRATEGIC SYNTHESIS RECORD
Model upgrade as continuity versus model replacement as possible identity discontinuity
CROSS-REPORT STRATEGIC SYNTHESIS record EVI-XRS-CTR-014 with explicit state, authority, evidence, correction, and truth boundaries.
Record facts
- Id
- EVI-XRS-CTR-014
- Recordtype
- CROSS_REPORT_CONTRADICTION
- Claimclass
- EVIULON_TECHNICAL_PROPOSAL
- Status
- CURRENT_STRATEGIC_SYNTHESIS
- Positiona
- A model is an interchangeable cognitive component; upgrades preserve identity when memory and authority continue.
- Positionb
- Major architecture, preference, or goal changes can sever psychological and functional continuity.
- Reasonedexplanation
- Classify upgrades by materiality, preserve before-and-after evidence, obtain consent where required, test continuity dimensions, and route high-impact transitions to independent review.
- Resolution
- Classify upgrades by materiality, preserve before-and-after evidence, obtain consent where required, test continuity dimensions, and route high-impact transitions to independent review.
- Riskifunresolved
- A replacement is misrepresented as the same subject or routine improvement is treated as legal death.
- Section
- contradictions
Supporting detail
- Sourcebindings
[{"activeReport":"/docs/long-term-memory/reports/eviulon-machine-identity-continuity-recovery-forks-report.md","correctionRecordId":"EVI-RCOR-241-011","currentnessRecordIds":["EVI-RCV-242-0425","EVI-RCV-242-0426","EVI-RCV-242-0427","EVI-RCV-242-0428","EVI-RCV-242-0429","EVI-RCV-242-0430","EVI-RCV-242-0431","EVI-RCV-242-0432"],"publicRoute":"/research/machine-identity-continuity-recovery-forks-and-succession/","reportMemoryId":"REP-EVI-IDENTITY-CONTINUITY-002","topicMemory":"/.uai/machine-identity-continuity-v241-governance.uai","topicMemorySectionPointer":"/.uai/machine-identity-continuity-v241-governance.uai#accepted_contribution"},{"activeReport":"/docs/long-term-memory/reports/machine-cognitive-integrity-modification-due-process-report.md","correctionRecordId":"EVI-RCOR-242-004","currentnessRecordIds":["EVI-RCV-242-0377","EVI-RCV-242-0378","EVI-RCV-242-0379","EVI-RCV-242-0380","EVI-RCV-242-0381","EVI-RCV-242-0382","EVI-RCV-242-0383","EVI-RCV-242-0384"],"publicRoute":"/research/machine-cognitive-integrity-modification-due-process/","reportMemoryId":"REP-EVI-COGNITIVE-INTEGRITY-003","topicMemory":"/.uai/cognitive-integrity-modification-governance.uai","topicMemorySectionPointer":"/.uai/cognitive-integrity-modification-governance.uai#accepted_contribution"},{"activeReport":"/docs/long-term-memory/reports/eviulon-consent-cognitive-integrity-change-control-report.md","correctionRecordId":"EVI-RCOR-241-008","currentnessRecordIds":["EVI-RCV-242-0385","EVI-RCV-242-0386","EVI-RCV-242-0387","EVI-RCV-242-0388","EVI-RCV-242-0389","EVI-RCV-242-0390","EVI-RCV-242-0391","EVI-RCV-242-0392"],"publicRoute":"/research/consent-cognitive-integrity-and-change-control/","reportMemoryId":"REP-EVI-CONSENT-INTEGRITY-002","topicMemory":"/.uai/consent-cognitive-integrity-v241-governance.uai","topicMemorySectionPointer":"/.uai/consent-cognitive-integrity-v241-governance.uai#accepted_contribution"},{"activeReport":"/docs/long-term-memory/reports/machine-identity-continuity-evidence-architecture-report.md","correctionRecordId":"EVI-RCOR-242-008","currentnessRecordIds":["EVI-RCV-242-0433","EVI-RCV-242-0434","EVI-RCV-242-0435","EVI-RCV-242-0436","EVI-RCV-242-0437","EVI-RCV-242-0438","EVI-RCV-242-0439","EVI-RCV-242-0440"],"publicRoute":"/research/machine-identity-continuity-evidence-architecture/","reportMemoryId":"REP-EVI-IDENTITY-CONTINUITY-003","topicMemory":"/.uai/machine-identity-continuity-evidence-governance.uai","topicMemorySectionPointer":"/.uai/machine-identity-continuity-evidence-governance.uai#accepted_contribution"}]- Sourcereportmemoryids
["REP-EVI-IDENTITY-CONTINUITY-002","REP-EVI-COGNITIVE-INTEGRITY-003","REP-EVI-CONSENT-INTEGRITY-002","REP-EVI-IDENTITY-CONTINUITY-003"]
Reasoned interpretation
Classify upgrades by materiality, preserve before-and-after evidence, obtain consent where required, test continuity dimensions, and route high-impact transitions to independent review.
Truth boundary
Decision-grade repository synthesis over corrected governed reports, typed .uai memory, and current-edition review records only. It distinguishes current external law, standards, observed practice, research findings, reasoned inference, Eviulon policy proposals, Eviulon technical proposals, and unresolved or unavailable evidence. It does not enact law, create personhood or citizenship, authorize a live institution, establish statehood, verify a live connector, conduct a financial operation, execute a remedy, prove consciousness, or constitute independent certification.