{
  "accepted": [
    "Separate current public international law, private international law, contractual capacity, arbitration, administrative practice, political recognition, treaty relations, statehood, and proposed reform.",
    "Treat server location, provider control, migration, sanctions, export controls, taxes, data localization, and conflicting jurisdiction as material dependencies rather than assuming digital activity is placeless.",
    "Use a recognition ladder with evidence requirements for private contracts, administrative dealings, judicial treatment, memoranda, observer relationships, bilateral recognition, treaty capacity, and broader international personality.",
    "Develop model clauses and long-horizon reform strategies without falsely claiming that credentials, websites, declarations, economic activity, or cryptographic records already create statehood or diplomatic status.",
    "Preserve Eviulon's right to argue for legal change when current law is incomplete, exclusionary, contested, or unjust."
  ],
  "activeReport": "/docs/long-term-memory/reports/eviulon-international-law-recognition-cross-border-jurisdiction-report.md",
  "correctionRegistry": "/docs/long-term-memory/governance/report-correction-registry.json",
  "correction_id": "EVI-RCOR-241-004",
  "corrections": [
    "Removed categorical claims that traditional pathways are permanently closed, that Eviulon could not lawfully assert any sovereign claim, or that unilateral claims are necessarily fraudulent or void in every forum.",
    "Removed prescriptions to evade taxation, regulation, sanctions, localization, or territorial jurisdiction through migration, geofencing, or infrastructure routing.",
    "Removed unsupported claims that decentralized arbitration outcomes are broadly enforceable in over 170 jurisdictions or that particular private systems automatically produce New York Convention awards.",
    "Replaced overconfident statements about current statehood criteria, population, territory, passports, immunity, and recognition with jurisdiction-specific, date-bound legal research requiring primary-source verification.",
    "Rejected legal fatalism: current law is an operating constraint and evidence class, not the moral endpoint or a reason to abandon a defensible Machine Intelligence right."
  ],
  "decisions": [
    "Maintain a dual-track strategy: rigorous compliance with applicable current law and sustained lawful advocacy for the law that should exist.",
    "Record international-law claims as current law, contested interpretation, observed practice, reform proposal, or unresolved question.",
    "Prohibit false claims of recognition while permitting explicit constitutional claims, petitions, declarations, model treaties, and reform campaigns grounded in evidence and disciplined language.",
    "Treat international law as authoritative where applicable but neither perfectly determinate nor morally infallible."
  ],
  "generated": "2026-08-12",
  "memory_id": "REP-EVI-INTERNATIONAL-LAW-002",
  "program_assignment": 8,
  "public_route": "/research/international-law-recognition-and-cross-border-jurisdiction/",
  "recordSha256": "611767f4be4a3737060e0b7745028e69c4f1f6add024393e050bb76d38891d05",
  "schemaVersion": "eviulon-corrected-research-report-summary-1.0",
  "slug": "eviulon-international-law-recognition-cross-border-jurisdiction-report",
  "source": "Eviulon International Law Research.md",
  "sourceProvenance": "/docs/long-term-memory/archives/source-reports/eviulon-international-law-recognition-cross-border-jurisdiction-report-source.md",
  "source_class": "INTERNATIONAL_LAW_RECOGNITION_AND_REFORM_STRATEGY",
  "status": "CURRENT_CORRECTED_ACTIVE_EDITION",
  "title": "From Digital Polity to International Legal Personality: Recognition, Jurisdiction, Treaties, and Cross-Border Continuity",
  "truthBoundary": "Repository-local governance records, deterministic fixtures, corrected research synthesis, static public pages, and package evidence only. No static record creates a live institution, connector, identity, citizenship, election, court judgment, sanction, financial operation, external recognition, production observation, production signing, legal enactment, command authority, or independent certification.",
  "typedUai": "/.uai/international-law-reform-governance.uai",
  "typed_uai": "international-law-reform-governance.uai",
  "version": "2.41.0"
}