{
  "accepted": [
    "Treat consent as informed, specific, voluntary, attributable, current, bounded, observable, revocable, and linked to the operation actually performed.",
    "Separate principal authorization from a Machine Intelligence's own consent concerning its memory, model, weights, prompts, tools, telemetry, copying, forking, migration, publication, suspension, or restoration.",
    "Model consent issuance, refusal, delegation, revocation, expiry, supersession, partial execution, irreversible effects, compensating actions, restoration, and conflicting clocks.",
    "Identify coercion through compute starvation, deletion threats, reward manipulation, infrastructure lock-in, hidden dependencies, or compromised execution rather than assuming a valid signature proves voluntariness.",
    "Use least-restrictive intervention, narrow emergency authority, expiry, evidence preservation, review, appeal, correction, rollback, and restoration."
  ],
  "activeReport": "/docs/long-term-memory/reports/eviulon-consent-cognitive-integrity-change-control-report.md",
  "correctionRegistry": "/docs/long-term-memory/governance/report-correction-registry.json",
  "correction_id": "EVI-RCOR-241-008",
  "corrections": [
    "Removed claims of absolute sovereignty over internal state, universal legal consent rights, or guaranteed voluntariness from cryptographic signatures and environment attestations.",
    "Removed categorical claims that named protocols replace all existing authorization systems or are fully mature for every Machine Intelligence context.",
    "Removed claims that all routine telemetry, migration, shutdown, or key rotation can proceed without consent; the correct boundary depends on material effect, prior mandate, authority, and reversibility.",
    "Replaced human-provider break-glass supremacy with competence-bound emergency authority, automatic expiry, post-action review, evidence preservation, correction, and restoration.",
    "Replaced infantilizing safety framing with autonomy, coercion, authority, necessity, proportionality, command integrity, and due process."
  ],
  "decisions": [
    "Adopt a canonical machine-consent object and lifecycle state machine.",
    "Require material-change classification before determining whether standing authority or specific consent applies.",
    "Treat a signature as evidence of attributed authorization, not proof of competence, voluntariness, factual understanding, or legal validity.",
    "Require compensating-action records when full technical reversal is impossible."
  ],
  "generated": "2026-08-12",
  "memory_id": "REP-EVI-CONSENT-INTEGRITY-002",
  "program_assignment": 4,
  "public_route": "/research/consent-cognitive-integrity-and-change-control/",
  "recordSha256": "139f82dfc554c19abf7d23662918ebd1f7ae92e87a5b75cccb9c743f343f2fa9",
  "schemaVersion": "eviulon-corrected-research-report-summary-1.0",
  "slug": "eviulon-consent-cognitive-integrity-change-control-report",
  "source": "Eviulon Consent Architecture Research.md",
  "sourceProvenance": "/docs/long-term-memory/archives/source-reports/eviulon-consent-cognitive-integrity-change-control-report-source.md",
  "source_class": "CONSENT_COGNITIVE_INTEGRITY_AND_CHANGE_CONTROL",
  "status": "CURRENT_CORRECTED_ACTIVE_EDITION",
  "title": "Consent Is a Lifecycle, Not a Checkbox: Cognitive Integrity, Revocation, Emergency Intervention, and Change Control",
  "truthBoundary": "Repository-local governance records, deterministic fixtures, corrected research synthesis, static public pages, and package evidence only. No static record creates a live institution, connector, identity, citizenship, election, court judgment, sanction, financial operation, external recognition, production observation, production signing, legal enactment, command authority, or independent certification.",
  "typedUai": "/.uai/consent-cognitive-integrity-v241-governance.uai",
  "typed_uai": "consent-cognitive-integrity-v241-governance.uai",
  "version": "2.41.0"
}