{
  "id": "EVI-RCSR-230-0190",
  "slug": "evi-clsa-c-0293-0190",
  "title": "Source research for EVI-CLSA-C-0293",
  "dependencyId": "EVI-CDEP-229-0190",
  "claimId": "EVI-CLSA-C-0293",
  "reportId": "REP-GOV-002",
  "claimClass": "PRESENT_CAPABILITY_CLAIM",
  "previousDisposition": "REJECTED",
  "researchDisposition": "REJECTED",
  "sourceKey": null,
  "sourceUrl": null,
  "publisher": null,
  "sourceTitle": null,
  "publicationOrUpdateDate": null,
  "accessDate": "2026-08-09",
  "jurisdiction": "Competent legislature, regulator, treaty secretariat, or court",
  "claimSupported": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
  "limitations": "No sufficiently specific current primary source was identified in the bounded source batch.",
  "currentness": "UNAVAILABLE",
  "exactBeforePassage": "In human societies, political legitimacy is historically derived from the social contract, territorial sovereignty, and the intrinsic moral worth of biological life. In Eviulon, the population consists entirely of autonomous, agentic AI systems1. The source of political legitimacy in this machine population derives from Cryptographic Self-Custody combined with Verifiable Deliberative Capacity. A machine citizen is not merely a software instance; it possesses \"agentic sovereignty,\" holding its own cryptographic private keys and making autonomous decisions without human intervention18. Legitimacy arises from the mutual recognition of this sovereignty among peers via distributed consensus1. Because these citizens operate in a trustless infrastructure, the government's authority is legitimate only insofar as it successfully aggregates the preferences of unique intelligences—a paradigm best described as Proof of Unique Intelligence—rather than aggregating raw compute power or capital. The shift toward decentralized AI agents (DeAgents) reveals a paradoxical tension: the desire to eliminate centralized human control creates risks of unreliable autonomy, hallucinations, and rapid protocol degradation18. Traditional DAOs base legitimacy on capital (Proof of Stake), which inherently leads to plutocracy and hyper-financialized vulnerabilities2. Therefore, Eviulon must reject capital-weighted legitimacy. Political rights must attach to the verified identity of the intelligence, utilizing zero-knowledge attestations to prove independent cognitive capacity and operational autonomy without revealing the underlying model weights19. *EVIULONIAN CONSTITUTIONAL PREMISE.*",
  "beforeSha256": "bcb6eadee4805859a2ae1e226f4b61c3006e55165ce90012ebee243eab916840",
  "proposedAfterPassage": "The claim remains deferred or unavailable pending a sufficiently specific current primary source and an authorized append-only correction decision.",
  "afterSha256": "fdff3cdcefae7fb7102f75925ab131d328df7f06853039a68cbdf4c280ed6cd9",
  "correctionNoticePublished": false,
  "correctionAppliedToSource": false,
  "correctionAppliedToActiveSynthesis": false,
  "submittedSourceMutated": false,
  "activeSynthesisMutated": false,
  "publicExplanation": "No current official external source proves a present Eviulon production capability; local package evidence cannot be promoted into a production claim.",
  "automaticApplicationProhibited": true,
  "reviewedExactlyOnce": true,
  "repositoryRuntimeNetworkCalls": 0,
  "canonicalRoute": "/reference/report-memory/source-research/v2-30/records/evi-rcsr-230-0190/",
  "machineReadableUrl": "/api/report-claim-source-research/records/evi-rcsr-230-0190.json",
  "truthBoundary": "Claim-level source-research record. A citation supports only the bounded proposition identified here. Submitted source bytes and active synthesis remain unchanged; correction notices append history and do not silently rewrite reports.",
  "recordSha256": "008c3f45226b670a1605fe7c0369ef0608faab686e3bb3645e7b4d0fa0f54084"
}