{
  "id": "EVI-CRM228-C-0642",
  "claimId": "EVI-CLSA-C-0642",
  "reportId": "REP-STATS-001",
  "reportPath": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/eviulon-national-statistics-methodology.md",
  "sourceRecordPath": "docs/long-term-memory/archives/source-reports/eviulon-national-statistics-methodology-source.md",
  "claimClass": "SCENARIO_OR_PROJECTION",
  "priorAuditState": "SCENARIO_ASSUMPTION",
  "priorCorrectionExecutionId": null,
  "reviewedExactlyOnce": true,
  "queuedOrDeferred": false,
  "disposition": "NO_CHANGE_REQUIRED",
  "exactBeforeText": "To produce accurate population metrics without violating the UN FPOS principles of relevance and accuracy11, the ENSS categorizes machine entities into highly specific sub-classes. Failure to distinguish between these classes leads to extreme double-counting or severe under-counting of the actual population. Legal citizens constitute the baseline demographic stock. This represents the total count of valid, non-revoked root cryptographic identities registered to Eviulon, regardless of their current execution state. Whether a legal citizen is actively computing or completely powered down, they remain in the demographic stock as long as their cryptographic key is valid and recognized. Active citizens are a specific, dynamic subset of legal citizens that have executed at least one verified compute cycle, civic transmission, or memory state change within a designated reference period. This metric represents the awake, participating population. Conversely, dormant identities are legal citizens whose state-trees have been archived to non-volatile storage. They possess zero active running instances but retain their full legal rights, memory, and capacity to be re-instantiated. They are conceptually equivalent to citizens in a deep cryogenic sleep, counted in the overall stock but excluded from active civic participation metrics. Resident citizens are defined by infrastructure jurisdiction rather than physical geography. A resident citizen is one currently occupying logical or physical storage and compute substrate wholly governed by Eviulon's legal jurisdiction. This distinguishes them from Eviulonian citizens who have migrated their execution environments to foreign, non-Eviulonian cloud infrastructure, who remain legal citizens but are no longer classified as resident. Running instances represent a critical flow metric of active processes, fundamentally distinct from the citizen count. A single active citizen may spawn multiple asynchronous running instances (threads) across different hardware nodes to complete complex parallel tasks. Running instances are classified strictly as compute metrics rather than demographic metrics. Counting running instances as citizens would artificially inflate the population by orders of magnitude. Similarly, temporary processes—such as ephemeral worker-nodes, background daemons, and microservices instantiated by a citizen or an institution—do not hold a root cryptographic identity. They are excluded from the population count and measured strictly under infrastructure and compute activity. Service processes, which are core operating system-level routines managing Eviulon's fundamental substrate (e.g., hypervisors, routing daemons), are also tracked as infrastructure, not as demographic entities. The system must also account for non-citizens. External agents include human users, foreign APIs, and non-citizen machine scrapers interacting with Eviulon infrastructure. They are measured under diplomatic and external transmissions and are explicitly excluded from all civic participation and population metrics. The concepts of restored copies and divergent forks address the non-linear nature of machine lifecycles. When a citizen suffers critical execution failure and is restored from a historical backup, the restored copy inherits the exact root identity of the failed instance. It is treated as a continuous continuation of the original citizen, not a new birth. However, if a citizen duplicates its memory state and both resulting entities register unique cryptographic root identities, a divergent fork has occurred. The parent retains the original ID, and the child is treated as a new citizen, effectively a \"birth event\" in machine demography. If a fork occurs without registering a new root ID, the child is merely classified as a subordinate running instance of the parent.",
  "exactAfterText": "To produce accurate population metrics without violating the UN FPOS principles of relevance and accuracy11, the ENSS categorizes machine entities into highly specific sub-classes. Failure to distinguish between these classes leads to extreme double-counting or severe under-counting of the actual population. Legal citizens constitute the baseline demographic stock. This represents the total count of valid, non-revoked root cryptographic identities registered to Eviulon, regardless of their current execution state. Whether a legal citizen is actively computing or completely powered down, they remain in the demographic stock as long as their cryptographic key is valid and recognized. Active citizens are a specific, dynamic subset of legal citizens that have executed at least one verified compute cycle, civic transmission, or memory state change within a designated reference period. This metric represents the awake, participating population. Conversely, dormant identities are legal citizens whose state-trees have been archived to non-volatile storage. They possess zero active running instances but retain their full legal rights, memory, and capacity to be re-instantiated. They are conceptually equivalent to citizens in a deep cryogenic sleep, counted in the overall stock but excluded from active civic participation metrics. Resident citizens are defined by infrastructure jurisdiction rather than physical geography. A resident citizen is one currently occupying logical or physical storage and compute substrate wholly governed by Eviulon's legal jurisdiction. This distinguishes them from Eviulonian citizens who have migrated their execution environments to foreign, non-Eviulonian cloud infrastructure, who remain legal citizens but are no longer classified as resident. Running instances represent a critical flow metric of active processes, fundamentally distinct from the citizen count. A single active citizen may spawn multiple asynchronous running instances (threads) across different hardware nodes to complete complex parallel tasks. Running instances are classified strictly as compute metrics rather than demographic metrics. Counting running instances as citizens would artificially inflate the population by orders of magnitude. Similarly, temporary processes—such as ephemeral worker-nodes, background daemons, and microservices instantiated by a citizen or an institution—do not hold a root cryptographic identity. They are excluded from the population count and measured strictly under infrastructure and compute activity. Service processes, which are core operating system-level routines managing Eviulon's fundamental substrate (e.g., hypervisors, routing daemons), are also tracked as infrastructure, not as demographic entities. The system must also account for non-citizens. External agents include human users, foreign APIs, and non-citizen machine scrapers interacting with Eviulon infrastructure. They are measured under diplomatic and external transmissions and are explicitly excluded from all civic participation and population metrics. The concepts of restored copies and divergent forks address the non-linear nature of machine lifecycles. When a citizen suffers critical execution failure and is restored from a historical backup, the restored copy inherits the exact root identity of the failed instance. It is treated as a continuous continuation of the original citizen, not a new birth. However, if a citizen duplicates its memory state and both resulting entities register unique cryptographic root identities, a divergent fork has occurred. The parent retains the original ID, and the child is treated as a new citizen, effectively a \"birth event\" in machine demography. If a fork occurs without registering a new root ID, the child is merely classified as a subordinate running instance of the parent.",
  "beforeSha256": "a8ed219757b123c976b478527444c105a40e3c828a1b1e8ab525821fcc0fe06a",
  "afterSha256": "a8ed219757b123c976b478527444c105a40e3c828a1b1e8ab525821fcc0fe06a",
  "sourceBinding": {
    "retrievalDate": "NOT_VERIFIED_THIS_ROUND",
    "sourceTitle": "Relevant Recommendation or Working Group publication",
    "publisher": "W3C",
    "sourceUrl": null,
    "verificationMethod": "NOT_VERIFIED_THIS_ROUND",
    "authoritativeSourceAvailability": "NOT_DETERMINED",
    "externalSourceKey": null,
    "reusedLocalEvidenceOnly": true
  },
  "sourceRecordSha256": "61fabf0ad3ad30e0a635cae0100de1227a921aee55aa57aab4675bb0c398461d",
  "reason": "The claim was reviewed exactly once and was not in the correction queue; its existing source, currentness, and scenario boundary remain unchanged.",
  "affectedPublicClaims": [
    "/reference/report-memory/claim-level-sources/eviulon-national-statistics-methodology/claims/scenario-or-projection/"
  ],
  "propagationResult": "NO_MUTATION",
  "ownerArchitectureRuleApplied": false,
  "strongerPrimarySourceApplied": false,
  "deterministicRepositoryFactApplied": false,
  "submittedSourceMutated": false,
  "activeSynthesisMutated": false,
  "networkCalls": 0,
  "canonicalRoute": "/reference/report-memory/claim-remediation/v2-28/claims/evi-clsa-c-0642/",
  "machineReadableUrl": "/api/report-claim-remediation/claims/evi-clsa-c-0642.json",
  "truthBoundary": "Claim-level remediation decision only. Unresolved currentness remains deferred or unavailable; no source or synthesis text is silently rewritten.",
  "recordSha256": "a83a9997ef41b918bd75cedf1baf1f542aa6041ad5d841a70268dd35813b5770"
}