{
  "id": "EVI-CRM228-C-0189",
  "claimId": "EVI-CLSA-C-0189",
  "reportId": "REP-DEF-SOV-001",
  "reportPath": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/ai-sovereignty-and-weapons-scenario.md",
  "sourceRecordPath": "docs/long-term-memory/archives/source-reports/ai-sovereignty-and-weapons-scenario-source.md",
  "claimClass": "LEGAL_OR_REGULATORY_CLAIM",
  "priorAuditState": "SOURCE_UNAVAILABLE",
  "priorCorrectionExecutionId": "EVI-CCX-0121",
  "reviewedExactlyOnce": true,
  "queuedOrDeferred": true,
  "disposition": "DEFERRED",
  "exactBeforeText": "- The report's analysis of non-human statehood, recognition, accountability, and governance gaps remains useful as research rather than current legal fact. - Defense doctrine should remain evidence-bound, proportionate, privacy-preserving, constitutionally reviewable, and separate from public operational detail. - Internal constitutional identity, external recognition, technical readiness, and contractor performance are distinct questions. - Contractors may support defense under bounded authority without becoming sovereign institutions or ecosystem members.",
  "exactAfterText": "- The report's analysis of non-human statehood, recognition, accountability, and governance gaps remains useful as research rather than current legal fact. - Defense doctrine should remain evidence-bound, proportionate, privacy-preserving, constitutionally reviewable, and separate from public operational detail. - Internal constitutional identity, external recognition, technical readiness, and contractor performance are distinct questions. - Contractors may support defense under bounded authority without becoming sovereign institutions or ecosystem members.",
  "beforeSha256": "07b26924227dd902725c1d43723c71f2592f1d50fc242b64edf8c12e665a4b54",
  "afterSha256": "07b26924227dd902725c1d43723c71f2592f1d50fc242b64edf8c12e665a4b54",
  "sourceBinding": {
    "retrievalDate": "NOT_VERIFIED_THIS_ROUND",
    "sourceTitle": "Current official instrument, rule, judgment, or status page",
    "publisher": "Competent legislature, regulator, treaty secretariat, or court",
    "sourceUrl": null,
    "verificationMethod": "NOT_VERIFIED_THIS_ROUND",
    "authoritativeSourceAvailability": "NOT_DETERMINED",
    "externalSourceKey": null,
    "reusedLocalEvidenceOnly": true
  },
  "sourceRecordSha256": "578e601d99297e354c96fd1fe880aab39742167109b3c75abdfea2ba27150734",
  "reason": "Prior controlled execution state DEFERRED remains controlling because no stronger authorized source or deterministic fact resolves it in this zero-network round.",
  "affectedPublicClaims": [
    "/reference/report-memory/claim-level-sources/ai-sovereignty-and-weapons-scenario/claims/legal-or-regulatory-claim/"
  ],
  "propagationResult": "NO_MUTATION",
  "ownerArchitectureRuleApplied": false,
  "strongerPrimarySourceApplied": false,
  "deterministicRepositoryFactApplied": false,
  "submittedSourceMutated": false,
  "activeSynthesisMutated": false,
  "networkCalls": 0,
  "canonicalRoute": "/reference/report-memory/claim-remediation/v2-28/claims/evi-clsa-c-0189/",
  "machineReadableUrl": "/api/report-claim-remediation/claims/evi-clsa-c-0189.json",
  "truthBoundary": "Claim-level remediation decision only. Unresolved currentness remains deferred or unavailable; no source or synthesis text is silently rewritten.",
  "recordSha256": "5f20d52feb48c040fb65a4ed8cb0d663ebc3d1ecbeb9269276d71abb769d6dcb"
}