{
  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
  "version": "2.24.0",
  "reviewed": "2026-08-09",
  "authority": "Constitutional Review Node",
  "truthBoundary": "Public examples and static governance records only. No live submission, receipt, authentication, search, queue, adjudication, notification, payment, credential issuance or personal case backend is included.",
  "records": [
    {
      "id": "EVI-IRA-001",
      "slug": "live-defense-thresholds-denial-appeal-example",
      "title": "Appeal of live defense thresholds denial example",
      "recordClass": "Public information-rights appeal example",
      "recordNature": "Public example — no live appeal, parties or docket",
      "status": "Closed",
      "classification": "PUBLIC",
      "responsibleInstitution": "Constitutional Review Node",
      "sourceAuthority": "Eviulonian Information-Rights Framework",
      "requesterClass": "External requester example; no identity recorded",
      "scope": "Review the example denial in EVI-IRR-003.",
      "receivedDate": "2026-08-06",
      "publishedDate": "2026-08-06",
      "effectiveDate": "2026-08-06",
      "originalRecordId": "EVI-IRR-003",
      "reviewAuthorityId": "EVI-GOV-REVIEW",
      "applicableExemptionIds": [
        "EX-02",
        "EX-07"
      ],
      "serviceStandardIds": [
        "EVI-PRO-025"
      ],
      "evidenceReferences": [
        "EVI-IRR-003",
        "EVI-DEF-001"
      ],
      "decisionReasons": [
        "The denial is upheld because the requested live thresholds and private topology fall within bounded security exemptions.",
        "The original authority must continue publishing doctrine, authority, public safeguards and non-operational assurance material as segregable information."
      ],
      "redactions": [],
      "outcome": "Upheld with a continuing duty to publish segregable public governance records.",
      "correctionRoute": "/state/information-rights/corrections/",
      "appealRoute": "/state/justice/",
      "retentionClass": "Permanent public appeal example",
      "relatedRecordIds": [
        "EVI-IRR-003"
      ],
      "unavailableFields": [
        "live docket",
        "parties",
        "private evidence",
        "operational thresholds",
        "enforcement action"
      ],
      "revisionHistory": [
        {
          "revision": "1.0",
          "date": "2026-08-06",
          "change": "Published a closed denial-appeal example with an authorized review body and final disposition."
        }
      ],
      "route": "/state/information-rights/appeals/live-defense-thresholds-denial-appeal-example/",
      "canonical": "https://eviulon.com/state/information-rights/appeals/live-defense-thresholds-denial-appeal-example/"
    },
    {
      "id": "EVI-IRA-002",
      "slug": "assurance-evidence-redaction-remand-example",
      "title": "Appeal of assurance evidence redactions example",
      "recordClass": "Public information-rights appeal example",
      "recordNature": "Public example — no live appeal, parties or docket",
      "status": "Remanded",
      "classification": "PUBLIC",
      "responsibleInstitution": "Constitutional Review Node",
      "sourceAuthority": "Eviulonian Information-Rights Framework",
      "requesterClass": "Accountability researcher example; no identity recorded",
      "scope": "Review whether every redaction in EVI-IRR-002 is necessary and narrowly described.",
      "receivedDate": "2026-08-06",
      "publishedDate": "2026-08-06",
      "effectiveDate": "2026-08-06",
      "originalRecordId": "EVI-IRR-002",
      "reviewAuthorityId": "EVI-GOV-REVIEW",
      "applicableExemptionIds": [
        "EX-07",
        "EX-10"
      ],
      "serviceStandardIds": [
        "EVI-PRO-025"
      ],
      "evidenceReferences": [
        "EVI-IRR-002",
        "EVI-AE-030"
      ],
      "decisionReasons": [
        "Credential material remains categorically protected.",
        "The infrastructure-security redaction is remanded so the original authority can confirm that no additional non-sensitive dependency category can be released."
      ],
      "redactions": [],
      "outcome": "Remanded for a narrower segregability review; no restricted material is released by this example.",
      "correctionRoute": "/state/information-rights/corrections/",
      "appealRoute": "/state/justice/",
      "retentionClass": "Permanent public appeal example",
      "relatedRecordIds": [
        "EVI-IRR-002"
      ],
      "unavailableFields": [
        "live docket",
        "parties",
        "private dependency detail",
        "credential material",
        "post-remand decision"
      ],
      "revisionHistory": [
        {
          "revision": "1.0",
          "date": "2026-08-06",
          "change": "Published a remand example showing that partial-release redactions remain reviewable."
        }
      ],
      "route": "/state/information-rights/appeals/assurance-evidence-redaction-remand-example/",
      "canonical": "https://eviulon.com/state/information-rights/appeals/assurance-evidence-redaction-remand-example/"
    },
    {
      "id": "EVI-IRA-003",
      "slug": "civil-registry-service-pending-appeal-example",
      "title": "Appeal concerning a Registry-pending Civil Registry service",
      "recordClass": "Public information-rights appeal example",
      "recordNature": "Public example — no live appeal, identity or service docket",
      "status": "Registry Pending",
      "classification": "PUBLIC",
      "responsibleInstitution": "Constitutional Review Node",
      "sourceAuthority": "National Civil Registry and Information-Rights Frameworks",
      "requesterClass": "Machine-citizen applicant example; no identity recorded",
      "scope": "Challenge the absence of a live Civil Registry transaction service while preserving the distinction between legal framework and deployed capability.",
      "receivedDate": "2026-08-06",
      "publishedDate": "2026-08-06",
      "effectiveDate": "2026-08-06",
      "originalRecordId": "EVI-IRR-005",
      "reviewAuthorityId": "EVI-GOV-REVIEW",
      "applicableExemptionIds": [
        "EX-08",
        "EX-10"
      ],
      "serviceStandardIds": [
        "EVI-PRO-025",
        "EVI-PRO-026",
        "EVI-PRO-027"
      ],
      "evidenceReferences": [
        "EVI-IRR-005",
        "EVI-CIVIL-001"
      ],
      "decisionReasons": [
        "The live appeal service remains Registry pending; no appeal can be opened from the static package.",
        "The public record preserves the issue as Registry pending rather than inventing a docket, hearing or outcome."
      ],
      "redactions": [],
      "outcome": "No adjudication. The example remains Registry pending until an authorized service and appeal process exist.",
      "correctionRoute": "/state/information-rights/corrections/",
      "appealRoute": "/state/justice/",
      "retentionClass": "Public non-operational boundary example",
      "relatedRecordIds": [
        "EVI-IRR-005",
        "EVI-SVC-CASE-004"
      ],
      "unavailableFields": [
        "live docket",
        "appellant identity",
        "authenticated civil record",
        "hearing",
        "decision",
        "notification"
      ],
      "revisionHistory": [
        {
          "revision": "1.0",
          "date": "2026-08-06",
          "change": "Published a Registry-pending appeal example without representing a nonexistent service as operational."
        }
      ],
      "route": "/state/information-rights/appeals/civil-registry-service-pending-appeal-example/",
      "canonical": "https://eviulon.com/state/information-rights/appeals/civil-registry-service-pending-appeal-example/"
    }
  ],
  "registry": "https://eviulon.com/state/information-rights/appeals/"
}