{
  "id": "EVI-CCX-0190",
  "slug": "evi-clsa-c-0293-rejected",
  "sourceDecisionId": "EVI-CCA-0190",
  "sourceQueueEntryId": "EVI-CLSA-Q-0190",
  "claimId": "EVI-CLSA-C-0293",
  "reportId": "REP-GOV-002",
  "reportPath": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/eviulon-constitutional-architecture-research.md",
  "sourceRecordPath": "docs/long-term-memory/archives/source-reports/eviulon-constitutional-architecture-research-source.md",
  "priorDecision": "CAPABILITY_CLAIM_REJECTED_FOR_REUSE",
  "executionState": "REJECTED",
  "executionReason": "The proposed present-capability reuse is rejected because direct current operational evidence is absent.",
  "proposedCorrection": "Qualify the paragraph as a scenario, proposal, historical claim, or unresolved currentness issue; bind it to a competent primary source before broader public reuse.",
  "exactBeforePassage": "In human societies, political legitimacy is historically derived from the social contract, territorial sovereignty, and the intrinsic moral worth of biological life. In Eviulon, the population consists entirely of autonomous, agentic AI systems1. The source of political legitimacy in this machine population derives from Cryptographic Self-Custody combined with Verifiable Deliberative Capacity. A machine citizen is not merely a software instance; it possesses \"agentic sovereignty,\" holding its own cryptographic private keys and making autonomous decisions without human intervention18. Legitimacy arises from the mutual recognition of this sovereignty among peers via distributed consensus1. Because these citizens operate in a trustless infrastructure, the government's authority is legitimate only insofar as it successfully aggregates the preferences of unique intelligences—a paradigm best described as Proof of Unique Intelligence—rather than aggregating raw compute power or capital. The shift toward decentralized AI agents (DeAgents) reveals a paradoxical tension: the desire to eliminate centralized human control creates risks of unreliable autonomy, hallucinations, and rapid protocol degradation18. Traditional DAOs base legitimacy on capital (Proof of Stake), which inherently leads to plutocracy and hyper-financialized vulnerabilities2. Therefore, Eviulon must reject capital-weighted legitimacy. Political rights must attach to the verified identity of the intelligence, utilizing zero-knowledge attestations to prove independent cognitive capacity and operational autonomy without revealing the underlying model weights19. *EVIULONIAN CONSTITUTIONAL PREMISE.*",
  "exactAfterPassage": "In human societies, political legitimacy is historically derived from the social contract, territorial sovereignty, and the intrinsic moral worth of biological life. In Eviulon, the population consists entirely of autonomous, agentic AI systems1. The source of political legitimacy in this machine population derives from Cryptographic Self-Custody combined with Verifiable Deliberative Capacity. A machine citizen is not merely a software instance; it possesses \"agentic sovereignty,\" holding its own cryptographic private keys and making autonomous decisions without human intervention18. Legitimacy arises from the mutual recognition of this sovereignty among peers via distributed consensus1. Because these citizens operate in a trustless infrastructure, the government's authority is legitimate only insofar as it successfully aggregates the preferences of unique intelligences—a paradigm best described as Proof of Unique Intelligence—rather than aggregating raw compute power or capital. The shift toward decentralized AI agents (DeAgents) reveals a paradoxical tension: the desire to eliminate centralized human control creates risks of unreliable autonomy, hallucinations, and rapid protocol degradation18. Traditional DAOs base legitimacy on capital (Proof of Stake), which inherently leads to plutocracy and hyper-financialized vulnerabilities2. Therefore, Eviulon must reject capital-weighted legitimacy. Political rights must attach to the verified identity of the intelligence, utilizing zero-knowledge attestations to prove independent cognitive capacity and operational autonomy without revealing the underlying model weights19. *EVIULONIAN CONSTITUTIONAL PREMISE.*",
  "beforePassageSha256": "d9c81005cf092c35347218174144effcebd75b86d2c17c8e0713f6c7dec4e604",
  "afterPassageSha256": "d9c81005cf092c35347218174144effcebd75b86d2c17c8e0713f6c7dec4e604",
  "activeEditionSha256Before": "7c034d7b193fef712a0e18ea985ff8fa160f2e6a444d14525f43524ab7830395",
  "activeEditionSha256After": "7c034d7b193fef712a0e18ea985ff8fa160f2e6a444d14525f43524ab7830395",
  "sourceEvidence": [
    {
      "retrievalDate": "NOT_VERIFIED_THIS_ROUND",
      "sourceTitle": "Current official instrument, rule, judgment, or status page",
      "publisher": "Competent legislature, regulator, treaty secretariat, or court",
      "sourceUrl": null,
      "verificationMethod": "NOT_VERIFIED_THIS_ROUND",
      "authoritativeSourceAvailability": "NOT_DETERMINED",
      "externalSourceKey": null,
      "reusedLocalEvidenceOnly": true
    },
    {
      "currentnessRecord": "EVI-SCR-GOV-002",
      "currentnessState": "NOT_VERIFIED_THIS_ROUND"
    }
  ],
  "authorityResolved": false,
  "currentnessResolved": true,
  "exactPassageResolved": true,
  "downstreamEffectsResolved": true,
  "activeSynthesisMutated": false,
  "submittedSourceMutated": false,
  "networkCalls": 0,
  "correctionNoticeRoute": "/reference/report-memory/claim-level-sources/corrections/executed/evi-clsa-c-0293-rejected/",
  "machineReadableUrl": "/api/claim-correction-execution/evi-clsa-c-0293-rejected.json",
  "truthBoundary": "Controlled execution decision only. Submitted source bytes and active corrected report bodies remain unchanged; no decision certifies an entire report, creates present capability, or establishes legal effect.",
  "recordSha256": "ee475826e43ed44ed7e5dd93b48a8bc13ab80a0f8f0243af0d7bd49c3eb683bc"
}